PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRPAX vs. BKIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRPAX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than BKIPX's 1.10% return.


RRPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
6M
0.96%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
2.91%
ALL TIME*
1.99%

BKIPX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.42%
6M
0.57%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.62%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%5.41%5.64%5.01%0.31%0.73%
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
1.10%6.08%4.77%3.37%-4.18%5.21%4.86%4.90%0.61%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RRPAX and BKIPX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.79

The correlation between RRPAX and BKIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRPAX vs. BKIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIPX
BKIPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BKIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RRPAXBKIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.20

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

7.05

+2.95

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the BKIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRPAX and BKIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, which is greater than BKIPX's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRPAX and BKIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRPAXBKIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-6.42%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.95%

-1.34%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-1.34%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-6.42%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.88%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-1.06%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.42%

-0.11%

Volatility

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) at 0.43%. This indicates that RRPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRPAXBKIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.43%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

2.03%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92%

2.42%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

3.12%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

2.65%

+0.05%

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRPAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than BKIPX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Dividend Comparison

RRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than BKIPX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
4.91%4.68%4.33%2.77%4.80%4.41%1.17%2.54%2.56%1.90%0.00%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
5.45%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRPAX and BKIPX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RRPAX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to BKIPX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRPAX dropped -16.15% vs BKIPX's -6.42%.

RRPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRPAX and BKIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer