PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRPAX vs. BKIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RRPAX having a 1.97% return and BKIPX slightly higher at 2.00%.


RRPAX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.97%
6M
1.99%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
2.98%

BKIPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.13%
YTD
2.00%
6M
2.06%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.97%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%5.41%5.64%5.01%0.31%0.73%
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
2.00%6.08%4.77%3.37%-4.18%5.21%4.86%4.90%0.61%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RRPAX and BKIPX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.80

The correlation between RRPAX and BKIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRPAX vs. BKIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIPX
BKIPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BKIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRPAXBKIPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

1.99

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.13

3.99

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.50

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.51

3.80

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.47

17.13

+3.34

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the BKIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRPAX and BKIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRPAXBKIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.99

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.91

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.13

-0.62

Drawdowns

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, which is greater than BKIPX's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRPAX and BKIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRPAXBKIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-6.42%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-1.32%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-1.32%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-6.42%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-1.07%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.29%

-0.06%

Volatility

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) is 0.59%, while iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that RRPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRPAXBKIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

1.23%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.33%

1.76%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

2.28%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

3.12%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

2.64%

+0.06%

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRPAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than BKIPX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RRPAX vs. BKIPX - Dividend Comparison

RRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than BKIPX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
4.63%4.68%4.33%2.77%4.80%4.41%1.17%2.54%2.56%1.90%0.00%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
3.92%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRPAX and BKIPX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKIPX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to RRPAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRPAX dropped -16.15% vs BKIPX's -6.42%.

RRPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRPAX and BKIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer