LIFIX vs. EARRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LIFIX (Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund) and EARRX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, LIFIX returned 3.97%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for EARRX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIFIX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for EARRX.

Performance

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFIX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than EARRX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LIFIX has outperformed EARRX with an annualized return of 3.97%, while EARRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.61% annualized return.

LIFIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.10%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 3.97%

EARRX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: 3.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund	1.17%	7.16%	4.81%	3.87%	-5.34%	10.43%	6.05%	5.17%	-1.06%	1.46%
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A	0.98%	5.46%	5.39%	5.95%	-3.22%	7.50%	5.05%	5.29%	-0.49%	1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFIX and EARRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.64

The correlation between LIFIX and EARRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LIFIX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFIX

LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EARRX

EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 65
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIFIX	EARRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.91	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.82	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.41	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	3.51	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.02	13.35	+1.67

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the EARRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFIX and EARRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFIX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFIX and EARRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIFIX	EARRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.02%	-10.27%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-0.88%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.11%	-1.18%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.49%	-6.39%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.02%	-10.27%	-7.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-0.69%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-1.08%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.23%	+0.08%

Volatility

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.74%. This indicates that LIFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIFIX	EARRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.74%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.76%	1.28%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	1.62%	+0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.00%	2.78%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.53%	2.72%	+1.81%

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIFIX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison

LIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than EARRX's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A	3.85%	4.36%	3.83%	4.24%	4.82%	3.32%	2.02%	2.46%	2.67%	1.90%	2.00%	1.73%
LIFIX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund	4.96%	4.94%	4.17%	3.88%	2.77%	2.55%	3.77%	4.15%	4.18%	3.96%	4.43%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIFIX and EARRX in my portfolio?

LIFIX and EARRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIFIX or EARRX?

LIFIX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to EARRX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFIX dropped -18.02% vs EARRX's -10.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.