PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRPAX vs. DFAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRPAX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than DFAAX's 2.04% return.


RRPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
6M
0.96%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
2.91%
ALL TIME*
1.99%

DFAAX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.62%
6M
0.68%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.62%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%2.88%
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
2.04%5.18%4.41%9.49%-13.40%20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RRPAX and DFAAX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between RRPAX and DFAAX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRPAX vs. DFAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAAX
DFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) and DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RRPAXDFAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

1.25

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

4.28

+5.72

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the DFAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRPAX and DFAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, roughly equal to the maximum DFAAX drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRPAX and DFAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRPAXDFAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-16.64%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.95%

-2.55%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-3.13%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-16.64%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.00%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-4.43%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.74%

-0.43%

Volatility

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) is 0.49%, while DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that RRPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRPAXDFAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.69%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

2.32%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92%

2.98%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

8.36%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

8.21%

-5.51%

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRPAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAAX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RRPAX vs. DFAAX - Dividend Comparison

RRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than DFAAX's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
4.60%2.90%4.09%3.96%2.06%13.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
5.45%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRPAX and DFAAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAAX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to RRPAX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRPAX dropped -16.15% vs DFAAX's -16.64%.

RRPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRPAX and DFAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer