PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRC vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 23.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RRC has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of -0.99%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.


RRC

1D
-0.16%
1M
-10.31%
YTD
4.66%
6M
2.71%
1Y
-10.37%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
18.95%
10Y*
-0.99%

XLE

1D
0.74%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
23.49%
6M
24.07%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
4.66%-1.05%19.35%23.05%41.10%166.12%38.14%-48.60%-43.60%-50.15%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
23.49%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RRC and XLE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.60

The correlation between RRC and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRC
RRC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RRCXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.25

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

2.18

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

6.53

-7.32

RRC vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRC Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRC and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RRC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRCXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.86%

-71.26%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.43%

-14.05%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-20.14%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.66%

-26.04%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.56%

-66.81%

-28.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.85%

-12.32%

-45.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.61%

-17.96%

-28.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.09%

4.69%

+8.40%

Volatility

RRC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.12%. This indicates that RRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRCXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

7.12%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

16.82%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.40%

20.93%

+11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.92%

25.98%

+18.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.45%

29.60%

+26.85%

Dividends

RRC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XLE's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
1.03%1.02%0.89%1.05%0.64%0.00%0.00%1.65%0.84%0.47%0.23%0.65%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.79%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRC and XLE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RRC has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to XLE (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRC dropped -97.86% vs XLE's -71.26%.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRC and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer