PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRC vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 30.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RRC has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of -0.23%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.08% annualized return.


RRC

1D
-0.30%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
12.74%
6M
4.68%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
23.39%
10Y*
-0.23%

XLE

1D
1.15%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
30.48%
6M
30.54%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
20.29%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
12.74%-1.05%19.35%23.05%41.10%166.12%38.14%-48.60%-43.60%-50.15%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
30.48%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RRC and XLE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.60

The correlation between RRC and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRC
RRC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRCXLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

2.20

-2.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

2.83

-2.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.35

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

3.88

-3.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.37

11.35

-10.98

RRC vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRC and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRCXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

2.20

-2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.78

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

0.34

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.31

-0.15

Drawdowns

RRC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRCXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.86%

-71.26%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.15%

-12.05%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-20.14%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.66%

-26.04%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.72%

-66.81%

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.60%

-7.35%

-47.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-17.98%

-28.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.09%

4.12%

+9.97%

Volatility

RRC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) have volatilities of 7.81% and 8.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRCXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

8.19%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.00%

16.56%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.42%

20.53%

+11.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.21%

26.01%

+19.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.52%

29.59%

+26.93%

Dividends

RRC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than XLE's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
0.93%1.02%0.89%1.05%0.64%0.00%0.00%1.65%0.84%0.47%0.23%0.65%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.57%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRC and XLE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to RRC (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRC dropped -97.86% vs XLE's -71.26%.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRC and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer