PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQI vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RQI vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (RQI) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQI achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 27.96% return.


RQI

1D
1.56%
1M
-2.27%
6M
6.78%
YTD
14.09%
1Y
10.28%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
7.35%

SDCI

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.91%
6M
22.03%
YTD
27.96%
1Y
33.49%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
20.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQI vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc.
14.09%2.07%8.04%15.74%-31.07%56.64%-9.28%54.62%-5.23%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
27.96%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%-10.61%-2.36%-13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RQI and SDCI is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018

0.13

The correlation between RQI and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQI vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQI
RQI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQI vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (RQI) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RQISDCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.33

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

3.05

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

9.53

-7.27

RQI vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the SDCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQI and SDCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RQI vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQISDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.59%

-45.79%

-45.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-11.03%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-11.96%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.06%

-18.55%

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.06%

-3.76%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-11.52%

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

3.52%

+1.05%

Volatility

RQI vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (RQI) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQISDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

5.27%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

14.59%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

17.16%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

18.43%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.95%

17.08%

+9.87%

RQI vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQI has a 2.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RQI vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, more than SDCI's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc.
9.35%9.54%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.88%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RQI and SDCI have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDCI has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to RQI (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQI dropped -91.59% vs SDCI's -45.79%.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQI and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer