RPXIX vs. MMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPXIX (RiverPark Large Growth Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by RiverPark Funds, while MMM (3M Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RPXIX returned 11.73%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for MMM. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RPXIX vs. MMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and 3M Company (MMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPXIX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's -4.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RPXIX has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 11.73%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.

RPXIX

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 13.17%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 1.25%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

MMM

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 7.68%
• YTD: -4.36%
• 6M: -11.54%
• 1Y: 4.29%
• 3Y*: 24.75%
• 5Y*: 1.02%
• 10Y*: 4.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPXIX vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	1.10%	13.18%	22.55%	51.57%	-47.37%	1.09%	55.28%	32.49%	-4.78%	30.27%
MMM 3M Company	-4.36%	26.36%	46.13%	-3.33%	-29.63%	4.85%	2.77%	-4.29%	-16.90%	34.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RPXIX and MMM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.50

The correlation between RPXIX and MMM shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RPXIX vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPXIX

RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MMM

MMM Risk / Return Rank: 43
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPXIX vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPXIX	MMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	0.17	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	0.43	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.05	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	0.23	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	0.52	+2.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPXIX vs. MMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPXIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPXIX and MMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPXIX	MMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	0.17	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.04	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.15	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.34	+0.16

Drawdowns

RPXIX vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPXIX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MMM drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPXIX and MMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPXIX	MMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.56%	-59.10%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.28%	-18.77%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.93%	-22.87%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.56%	-54.07%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.56%	-59.10%	+0.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.87%	-12.31%	+5.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.63%	-16.11%	+4.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	8.33%	-3.82%

Volatility

RPXIX vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) is 3.10%, while 3M Company (MMM) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that RPXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPXIX	MMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	7.35%	-4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	19.45%	-8.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.31%	26.00%	-11.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.27%	28.30%	-2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.74%	26.53%	-1.79%

Dividends

RPXIX vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison

RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than MMM's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMM 3M Company	1.99%	1.82%	16.27%	5.49%	4.97%	3.33%	3.36%	3.26%	2.86%	2.00%	2.49%	2.72%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	9.05%	9.15%	7.22%	0.00%	0.01%	3.79%	6.69%	11.76%	15.17%	9.01%	0.54%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPXIX and MMM in my portfolio?

RPXIX and MMM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPXIX or MMM?

MMM has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to RPXIX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPXIX dropped -58.56% vs MMM's -59.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.