PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPXIX vs. CGBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPXIX vs. CGBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPXIX achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than CGBD's -9.03% return.


RPXIX

1D
0.98%
1M
3.93%
YTD
2.50%
6M
2.24%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
11.89%

CGBD

1D
-0.45%
1M
-8.36%
YTD
-9.03%
6M
-7.55%
1Y
-10.27%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPXIX vs. CGBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPXIX
RiverPark Large Growth Fund
2.50%13.18%22.55%51.57%-47.37%1.09%55.28%32.49%-4.78%13.15%
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
-9.03%-21.53%33.53%18.01%17.70%49.48%-8.34%21.62%-31.01%18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RPXIX and CGBD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPXIX vs. CGBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPXIX
RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CGBD
CGBD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CGBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPXIX vs. CGBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPXIXCGBDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

-0.48

+1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

-0.57

+2.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.94

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

-0.57

+1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.49

-1.17

+4.66

RPXIX vs. CGBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the CGBD Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPXIX and CGBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPXIXCGBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

-0.48

+1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.35

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.20

+0.32

Drawdowns

RPXIX vs. CGBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPXIX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, smaller than the maximum CGBD drawdown of -71.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPXIX and CGBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPXIXCGBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-71.09%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-19.72%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-35.06%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

-35.06%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-31.04%

+25.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-12.46%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

9.66%

-5.15%

Volatility

RPXIX vs. CGBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) is 2.74%, while TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that RPXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPXIXCGBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

5.32%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

17.10%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

21.45%

-7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.27%

21.51%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

34.72%

-9.98%

Dividends

RPXIX vs. CGBD - Dividend Comparison

RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, less than CGBD's 14.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
14.60%13.21%10.43%11.76%11.46%10.92%14.33%13.00%13.55%6.09%0.00%0.00%
RPXIX
RiverPark Large Growth Fund
8.93%9.15%7.22%0.00%0.01%3.79%6.69%11.76%15.17%9.01%0.54%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPXIX and CGBD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGBD has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to RPXIX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPXIX dropped -58.56% vs CGBD's -71.09%.

RPXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPXIX and CGBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer