MMM vs. EMR

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly higher than EMR's -14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed EMR with an annualized return of 3.80%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively higher 9.01% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the EMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and EMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than EMR's 2.00% yield.

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, which is greater than EMR's maximum drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and EMR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

3M Company (MMM) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) have volatilities of 18.30% and 18.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.