RPXIX vs. AGRFX

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RPXIX having a -16.52% return and AGRFX slightly lower at -16.54%. Over the past 10 years, RPXIX has underperformed AGRFX with an annualized return of 2.41%, while AGRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.77% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RPXIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRFX's 1.12% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RPXIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is comparable to the AGRFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPXIX and AGRFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither RPXIX nor AGRFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum RPXIX drawdown since its inception was -59.98%, roughly equal to the maximum AGRFX drawdown of -61.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPXIX and AGRFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) at 10.10%. This indicates that RPXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.