PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPXIX vs. MMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPXIX vs. MMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (MMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPXIX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than MMLP's -17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RPXIX has outperformed MMLP with an annualized return of 11.83%, while MMLP has yielded a comparatively lower -16.35% annualized return.


RPXIX

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
11.83%

MMLP

1D
-10.04%
1M
-14.34%
YTD
-17.31%
6M
-13.68%
1Y
-30.14%
3Y*
2.31%
5Y*
-5.94%
10Y*
-16.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPXIX vs. MMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPXIX
RiverPark Large Growth Fund
-0.24%13.18%22.55%51.57%-47.37%1.09%55.28%32.49%-4.78%30.27%
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
-17.31%-26.82%50.60%-19.38%13.38%87.58%-62.45%-53.96%-15.36%-14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RPXIX and MMLP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.19

The correlation between RPXIX and MMLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPXIX vs. MMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPXIX
RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MMLP
MMLP Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPXIX vs. MMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (MMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPXIXMMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.94

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

-0.80

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

-1.53

+3.94

RPXIX vs. MMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPXIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the MMLP Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPXIX and MMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPXIX vs. MMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPXIX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, smaller than the maximum MMLP drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPXIX and MMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPXIXMMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-95.75%

+37.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-37.87%

+22.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-46.22%

+24.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

-64.19%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

-93.82%

+35.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-89.55%

+81.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-39.28%

+27.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

19.75%

-15.19%

Volatility

RPXIX vs. MMLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) is 5.30%, while Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (MMLP) has a volatility of 22.97%. This indicates that RPXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPXIXMMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

22.97%

-17.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

45.90%

-34.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

56.08%

-41.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.32%

53.41%

-27.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.76%

65.01%

-40.25%

Dividends

RPXIX vs. MMLP - Dividend Comparison

RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than MMLP's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
0.93%0.77%0.56%0.83%0.67%0.75%9.44%31.02%19.46%14.29%16.01%14.98%
RPXIX
RiverPark Large Growth Fund
9.17%9.15%7.22%0.00%0.01%3.79%6.69%11.76%15.17%9.01%0.54%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPXIX and MMLP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMLP has higher volatility (22.97%) compared to RPXIX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPXIX dropped -58.56% vs MMLP's -95.75%.

RPXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPXIX and MMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer