PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPXIX vs. BPTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPXIX vs. BPTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (BPTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPXIX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than BPTH's -43.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RPXIX has outperformed BPTH with an annualized return of 11.83%, while BPTH has yielded a comparatively lower -71.19% annualized return.


RPXIX

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
11.83%

BPTH

1D
-8.78%
1M
-17.68%
YTD
-43.75%
6M
-53.19%
1Y
-82.38%
3Y*
-90.75%
5Y*
-81.01%
10Y*
-71.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPXIX vs. BPTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPXIX
RiverPark Large Growth Fund
-0.24%13.18%22.55%51.57%-47.37%1.09%55.28%32.49%-4.78%30.27%
BPTH
Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.
-43.75%-94.83%-87.47%-69.34%-59.95%7.71%-56.20%128.29%-91.25%-85.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RPXIX and BPTH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPXIX vs. BPTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPXIX
RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BPTH
BPTH Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BPTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTH Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPXIX vs. BPTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (BPTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPXIXBPTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.96

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

-0.95

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

-1.37

+3.78

RPXIX vs. BPTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPXIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the BPTH Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPXIX and BPTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPXIX vs. BPTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPXIX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, smaller than the maximum BPTH drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPXIX and BPTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPXIXBPTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-100.00%

+41.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-86.79%

+71.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-99.94%

+78.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

-99.98%

+41.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

-100.00%

+41.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-100.00%

+91.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-88.82%

+77.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

61.06%

-56.50%

Volatility

RPXIX vs. BPTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) is 5.30%, while Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (BPTH) has a volatility of 80.46%. This indicates that RPXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPXIXBPTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

80.46%

-75.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

134.40%

-122.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

165.43%

-150.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.32%

141.80%

-115.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.76%

167.65%

-142.89%

Dividends

RPXIX vs. BPTH - Dividend Comparison

RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, while BPTH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPTH
Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RPXIX
RiverPark Large Growth Fund
9.17%9.15%7.22%0.00%0.01%3.79%6.69%11.76%15.17%9.01%0.54%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPXIX and BPTH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPTH has higher volatility (80.46%) compared to RPXIX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPXIX dropped -58.56% vs BPTH's -100.00%.

RPXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPXIX and BPTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer