RPXIX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPXIX (RiverPark Large Growth Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RPXIX returned 1.25%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPXIX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPXIX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 8.60% return.

RPXIX

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 13.17%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 1.25%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

FSPGX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	1.10%	13.18%	22.55%	51.57%	-47.37%	1.09%	55.28%	32.49%	-4.78%	29.09%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	8.60%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RPXIX and FSPGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.92

The correlation between RPXIX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RPXIX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPXIX

RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPXIX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	1.85	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.50	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.32	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	1.76	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	5.90	-2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPXIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPXIX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPXIX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	1.85	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.75	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.90	-0.39

Drawdowns

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPXIX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPXIX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPXIX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.56%	-32.66%	-25.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.28%	-16.17%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.93%	-23.32%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.56%	-32.66%	-25.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.87%	-0.38%	-6.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.63%	-6.37%	-5.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	4.81%	-0.30%

Volatility

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) is 3.10%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that RPXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPXIX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	3.32%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	11.58%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.31%	15.39%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.27%	21.49%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.74%	21.55%	+3.19%

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPXIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPXIX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	9.05%	9.15%	7.22%	0.00%	0.01%	3.79%	6.69%	11.76%	15.17%	9.01%	0.54%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPXIX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

RPXIX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPXIX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to RPXIX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPXIX dropped -58.56% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.