FSPGX vs. FSKAX

In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 0.27% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPGX and FSKAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.

The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and FSKAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 6.17%. This indicates that FSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.