PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPV vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 10.64%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


RPV

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.84%
YTD
10.48%
6M
12.73%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.64%

SPYV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.77%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
10.48%17.70%12.41%7.98%-1.27%34.22%-8.69%24.80%-12.31%17.30%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RPV and SPYV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006

0.89

The correlation between RPV and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RPV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPV
SPYV

Financial Services

17.9%
14.7%

Healthcare

16.2%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

15.2%
9.2%

Energy

11.3%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.9%

Basic Materials

9.0%
3.4%

Industrials

6.3%
10.6%

Communication Services

5.7%
3.2%

Utilities

4.0%
4.4%

Technology

2.8%
21.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
3.3%

Financial Services

RPV
17.9%
SPYV
14.7%

Healthcare

RPV
16.2%
SPYV
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

RPV
15.2%
SPYV
9.2%

Energy

RPV
11.3%
SPYV
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RPV
10.2%
SPYV
10.9%

Basic Materials

RPV
9.0%
SPYV
3.4%

Industrials

RPV
6.3%
SPYV
10.6%

Communication Services

RPV
5.7%
SPYV
3.2%

Utilities

RPV
4.0%
SPYV
4.4%

Technology

RPV
2.8%
SPYV
21.2%

Real Estate

RPV
1.4%
SPYV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPV
RPV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPVSPYVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

2.17

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

3.05

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.43

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.45

13.16

-0.71

RPV vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPV and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPVSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.17

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.75

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.70

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.42

-0.05

Drawdowns

RPV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPVSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

-58.45%

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-6.22%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-17.54%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-17.89%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

-36.89%

-13.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.57%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-8.72%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.62%

+0.59%

Volatility

RPV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that RPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPVSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

1.98%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

7.04%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

9.84%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

14.40%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

16.94%

+4.98%

RPV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
2.28%2.50%2.16%2.38%2.29%1.92%2.11%2.28%2.49%1.73%1.73%2.39%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPV and SPYV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPV has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.90% vs 10.64% for RPV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPV.

RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.

RPV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.04% for SPYV.

RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPV and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer