RPG vs. UGA
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPG returned 15.14%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
RPG vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 30.31% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RPG has outperformed UGA with an annualized return of 15.14%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.
RPG
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
RPG vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.31% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and UGA is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008 | 0.25 |
The correlation between RPG and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
UGA
RPG vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.17 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.16 | 9.39 | +3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPG vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -86.59% | +33.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -18.96% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -26.68% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -38.11% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | -75.89% | +39.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -18.05% | +13.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -36.69% | +27.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 6.43% | -3.50% |
Volatility
RPG vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 9.24% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 30.57% | -11.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.09% | 35.22% | -13.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 34.45% | -10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 37.22% | -14.32% |
RPG vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and UGA have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, RPG leads with 15.14% vs 14.31% for UGA. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RPG has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 14.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.75% for UGA.
RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPG and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer