RPG vs. SPYM
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPG returned 15.14%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for SPYM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
RPG vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 30.31% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RPG having a 15.14% annualized return and SPYM not far ahead at 15.61%.
RPG
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
SPYM
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
RPG vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.31% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.21% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and SPYM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006 | 0.81 |
The correlation between RPG and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
RPG vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPG
SPYM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
RPG
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
RPG
SPYM
Industrials
RPG
SPYM
Healthcare
RPG
SPYM
Communication Services
RPG
SPYM
Financial Services
RPG
SPYM
Utilities
RPG
SPYM
Energy
RPG
SPYM
Basic Materials
RPG
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
RPG
SPYM
Real Estate
RPG
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
SPYM
RPG vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPG | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 2.68 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.16 | 11.98 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPG vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -54.46% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -8.90% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -18.72% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -24.48% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | -33.87% | -2.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -3.14% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -7.14% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 1.99% | +0.94% |
Volatility
RPG vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.83%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 4.83% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 9.83% | +9.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.09% | 12.46% | +9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 16.90% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 18.03% | +4.87% |
RPG vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than SPYM's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.30% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and SPYM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.61% vs 15.14% for RPG. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.
RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPG and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer