RPG vs. RBIL
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RPG returned 24.43% vs 3.92% for RBIL. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
RPG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 22.47% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.68% return.
RPG
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 24.43%
- 3Y*
- 22.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.65%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.11M | $1.90M | $2.32M | |
| $42.21M | $42.12M | $41.16M |
RPG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 22.47% | 11.10% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.68% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
RBIL
RPG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPG | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 2.05 | -0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 7.00 | -5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 28.60 | -22.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -0.56% | -52.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -0.56% | -16.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.54% | -0.15% | -10.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -0.08% | -8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 0.14% | +3.98% |
Volatility
RPG vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 10.41% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.41% | 0.30% | +10.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.12% | 0.90% | +21.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 0.96% | +23.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 1.06% | +23.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 1.06% | +22.12% |
RPG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, RPG leads with 24.43% vs 3.92% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RPG has performed better with a 24.43% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.16% for RPG.
RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. RPG tracks S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPG and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer