RPG vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPG returned 13.02%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

RPG vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 21.39% return.

RPG

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 11.54%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 6M: 32.14%
• 1Y: 41.04%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPG vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	31.51%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	8.71%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and QQQM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.85

The correlation between RPG and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPG vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RPG	QQQM
Technology	39.6%	53.8%
Industrials	17.6%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	17.1%	12.3%
Communication Services	8.8%	15.8%
Healthcare	7.0%	4.2%
Financial Services	5.2%	0.2%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.1%
Energy	1.4%	0.6%
Utilities	1.1%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	7.7%

Return for Risk

RPG vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 65
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPG vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPG	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.65	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.46	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.45	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	3.53	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	13.52	+1.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPG vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPG and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPG	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.65	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.82	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.85	-0.30

Drawdowns

RPG vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPG	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.27%	-35.04%	-18.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-11.96%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.75%	-22.70%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.59%	-35.04%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-8.25%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	3.11%	-0.28%

Volatility

RPG vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPG	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	4.48%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	12.05%	+4.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.73%	15.91%	+3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	22.24%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.70%	22.12%	+0.58%

RPG vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPG vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.17%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPG and QQQM in my portfolio?

RPG and QQQM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPG or QQQM?

RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, RPG or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 13.02% for RPG. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPG or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPG or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPG or QQQM?

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

What is the main difference between RPG and QQQM?

RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.