PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPG vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPG vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 30.31% return, which is significantly higher than IUSG's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RPG has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 15.14%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.


RPG

1D
-4.60%
1M
5.48%
YTD
30.31%
6M
27.62%
1Y
38.51%
3Y*
27.72%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
15.14%

IUSG

1D
-2.31%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
9.19%
6M
7.87%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
17.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPG vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
30.31%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%26.20%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
9.19%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and IUSG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006

0.90

The correlation between RPG and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPG vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPG
IUSG

Technology

46.9%
50.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.7%
8.4%

Industrials

14.0%
6.6%

Healthcare

6.4%
6.4%

Communication Services

5.4%
15.2%

Financial Services

5.3%
8.7%

Utilities

2.4%
1.1%

Energy

1.6%
0.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.8%

Technology

RPG
46.9%
IUSG
50.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RPG
14.7%
IUSG
8.4%

Industrials

RPG
14.0%
IUSG
6.6%

Healthcare

RPG
6.4%
IUSG
6.4%

Communication Services

RPG
5.4%
IUSG
15.2%

Financial Services

RPG
5.3%
IUSG
8.7%

Utilities

RPG
2.4%
IUSG
1.1%

Energy

RPG
1.6%
IUSG
0.3%

Basic Materials

RPG
1.2%
IUSG
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

RPG
1.1%
IUSG
1.2%

Real Estate

RPG
1.0%
IUSG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPG vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPG vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPGIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.07

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

8.45

+4.71

RPG vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPG Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPG and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPG vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPGIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.27%

-63.41%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-13.07%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-22.28%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

-32.21%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.58%

-32.35%

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-5.23%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-21.40%

+12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.20%

-0.27%

Volatility

RPG vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) at 7.16%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPGIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

7.16%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

13.66%

+5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

16.92%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.86%

21.06%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

20.48%

+2.42%

RPG vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPG vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than IUSG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.50%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.15%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPG and IUSG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to IUSG (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.77% vs 15.14% for RPG. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.

RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.04% for IUSG.

RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPG and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer