RPG vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RPG is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPG returned 13.02%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for IQM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

RPG vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.

RPG

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 11.54%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 6M: 32.14%
• 1Y: 41.04%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPG vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	31.51%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	37.56%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	78.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and IQM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.87

The correlation between RPG and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPG vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RPG	IQM
Technology	39.6%	65.9%
Industrials	17.6%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	17.1%	4.1%
Communication Services	8.8%	2.1%
Healthcare	7.0%	1.1%
Financial Services	5.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Energy	1.4%	2.7%
Utilities	1.1%	3.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

RPG vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 65
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPG vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPG	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.67	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.11	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	5.13	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	16.79	-2.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPG vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPG and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPG	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.67	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.77	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.96	-0.42

Drawdowns

RPG vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPG	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.27%	-44.91%	-8.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-14.71%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.75%	-30.42%	+5.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.59%	-44.91%	+9.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-12.25%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	4.49%	-1.66%

Volatility

RPG vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is 6.43%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that RPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPG	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	9.20%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	22.92%	-6.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.73%	28.27%	-8.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	28.91%	-5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.70%	30.72%	-8.02%

RPG vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPG vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.17%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPG and IQM in my portfolio?

RPG and IQM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPG or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to RPG (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, RPG or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 13.02% for RPG. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPG has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPG or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPG or IQM?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPG or IQM?

RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

What is the main difference between RPG and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.