RPG vs. BBUS
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPG returned 13.02%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
RPG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
RPG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
RPG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 31.51% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 12.28% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and BBUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between RPG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
RPG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPG
BBUS
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
RPG
BBUS
Industrials
RPG
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
RPG
BBUS
Communication Services
RPG
BBUS
Healthcare
RPG
BBUS
Financial Services
RPG
BBUS
Basic Materials
RPG
BBUS
Energy
RPG
BBUS
Utilities
RPG
BBUS
Real Estate
RPG
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
RPG
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
BBUS
RPG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 3.00 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 13.76 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.33 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.79 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.84 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
RPG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -35.35% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -9.21% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -19.01% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -25.46% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.74% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -5.46% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.00% | +0.83% |
Volatility
RPG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 2.88% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 8.96% | +7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 11.87% | +7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 17.03% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 19.59% | +3.11% |
RPG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and BBUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 13.02% for RPG. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.
RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPG and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer