RPFGX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
RPFGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 1, 1991. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
RPFGX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPFGX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | -8.77% | 29.28% | 29.54% | 15.60% | -8.91% | 31.45% | -5.87% | 26.51% | -11.74% | 19.24% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -2.38% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a -8.77% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -2.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 12.09%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
RPFGX
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
FLC
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPFGX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPFGX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
RPFGX
FLC
RPFGX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPFGX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.65 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 0.87 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.85 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 3.23 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPFGX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.65 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | -0.03 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.28 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPFGX and FLC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RPFGX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than FLC's 7.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | 4.36% | 3.98% | 4.19% | 6.96% | 3.41% | 6.60% | 5.60% | 7.96% | 8.93% | 2.32% | 1.68% | 2.26% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.28% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
RPFGX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, smaller than the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPFGX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.11% | -76.79% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -8.69% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -40.14% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -55.27% | +10.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.61% | -5.76% | -5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -10.92% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 2.29% | +2.26% |
Volatility
RPFGX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 4.46%. This indicates that RPFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPFGX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.46% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 5.88% | +5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 11.39% | +7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 14.24% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 22.05% | +0.24% |