FLC vs. RMBKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX).
FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003. RMBKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 7, 1999.
Performance
FLC vs. RMBKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLC vs. RMBKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | -0.36% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLC achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than RMBKX's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FLC has underperformed RMBKX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while RMBKX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
RMBKX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLC vs. RMBKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLC has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBKX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLC vs. RMBKX — Risk / Return Rank
FLC
RMBKX
FLC vs. RMBKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLC | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 1.28 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.48 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 4.29 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLC | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.24 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.36 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.48 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLC and RMBKX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLC vs. RMBKX - Dividend Comparison
FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than RMBKX's 6.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 6.24% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLC vs. RMBKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLC drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, which is greater than RMBKX's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLC and RMBKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLC | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.79% | -55.45% | -21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -12.67% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -44.33% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -55.45% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -8.06% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -11.19% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 4.38% | -2.12% |
Volatility
FLC vs. RMBKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) is 4.25%, while RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLC | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.82% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 15.55% | -9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 24.42% | -13.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 24.97% | -10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 27.10% | -5.04% |