RPFGX vs. FAMRX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RPFGX (Davis Financial Fund) and FAMRX (Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund) are both mutual funds - RPFGX is a Financials Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FAMRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX returned 13.19%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for FAMRX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RPFGX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FAMRX.

Performance

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has outperformed FAMRX with an annualized return of 13.19%, while FAMRX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.

RPFGX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 3.71%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 1Y: 19.12%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: 13.82%
• 10Y*: 13.19%
• ALL TIME*: 12.29%

FAMRX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 8.29%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 1Y: 24.82%
• 3Y*: 16.79%
• 5Y*: 9.09%
• 10Y*: 11.37%
• ALL TIME*: 7.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund	3.41%	29.28%	29.54%	15.60%	-8.91%	31.45%	-5.87%	26.51%	-11.74%	19.24%
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	12.65%	20.87%	12.60%	18.98%	-18.55%	17.10%	19.37%	26.26%	-9.21%	21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFGX and FAMRX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between RPFGX and FAMRX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RPFGX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPFGX

RPFGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
RPFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RPFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
RPFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
RPFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RPFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FAMRX

FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPFGX	FAMRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.72	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	2.39	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.31	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	2.51	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.07	10.62	-7.55

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFGX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than FAMRX's maximum drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and FAMRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPFGX	FAMRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.11%	-58.65%	-8.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.54%	-9.33%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.30%	-15.35%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.86%	-26.00%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.24%	-30.96%	-14.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-1.45%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.83%	-12.26%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.58%	2.21%	+3.37%

Volatility

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) have volatilities of 3.97% and 3.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPFGX	FAMRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.90%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.73%	11.57%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.13%	13.68%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	14.85%	+4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.21%	15.29%	+6.92%

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPFGX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than FAMRX's 4.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	4.94%	5.56%	3.44%	1.33%	5.07%	3.15%	1.99%	5.52%	5.62%	2.31%	0.28%	4.83%
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund	3.85%	3.98%	4.19%	6.96%	3.41%	6.60%	5.60%	7.96%	8.93%	2.32%	1.68%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPFGX and FAMRX in my portfolio?

RPFGX and FAMRX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPFGX or FAMRX?

RPFGX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to FAMRX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFGX dropped -67.11% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.