PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAMRX vs. FBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMRX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than FBALX's 10.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAMRX having a 11.74% annualized return and FBALX not far ahead at 11.77%.


FAMRX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.24%
YTD
14.14%
6M
15.35%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
11.74%

FBALX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.04%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.50%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
14.14%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-9.21%21.08%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
10.30%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMRX and FBALX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 1999

0.93

The correlation between FAMRX and FBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAMRX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAMRXFBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.57

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.94

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

18.87

-3.84

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMRX and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAMRXFBALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.97

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.79

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.92

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.81

-0.38

Drawdowns

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMRX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, which is greater than FBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMRX and FBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAMRXFBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.65%

-43.57%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-6.47%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-12.88%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-22.89%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

-26.68%

-4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-4.37%

-7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.35%

+0.75%

Volatility

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 2.58%. This indicates that FAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAMRXFBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

2.58%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

6.80%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

8.58%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

12.18%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

12.78%

+2.48%

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAMRX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

FAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than FBALX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.87%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.14%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FAMRX and FBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAMRX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to FBALX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMRX dropped -58.65% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAMRX and FBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer