PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPAR vs. QTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPAR vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than QTR's 13.83% return.


RPAR

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
5.18%
6M
3.87%
1Y
15.72%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*

QTR

1D
0.52%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
13.83%
6M
12.15%
1Y
26.85%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPAR vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
5.18%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%2.59%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
13.83%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and QTR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021

0.45

The correlation between RPAR and QTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPAR vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPAR vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPARQTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.19

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

7.32

-1.41

RPAR vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPAR and QTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPAR vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and QTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPARQTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.16%

-31.72%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-12.29%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

-18.99%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.76%

-3.48%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-8.76%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.68%

-1.01%

Volatility

RPAR vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 3.68%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPARQTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

8.20%

-4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

12.84%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.55%

15.93%

-5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

18.34%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

18.34%

-5.64%

RPAR vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPAR vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than QTR's 16.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
16.49%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.12%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPAR and QTR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTR has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to RPAR (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs QTR's -31.72%.

On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 21.15% vs 8.05% for RPAR. On fees, RPAR is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RPAR is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.

QTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.49%, compared with 2.12% for RPAR.

RPAR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QTR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.60% for QTR.

QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPAR and QTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer