RPAR vs. QTR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR).

RPAR and QTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RPAR is an actively managed fund by Toroso Investments. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

RPAR vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RPAR vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	4.45%	17.91%	0.06%	6.03%	-22.82%	2.96%
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	-6.22%	14.52%	21.46%	45.53%	-29.94%	4.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's -6.22% return.

RPAR

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -4.89%
• YTD: 4.45%
• 6M: 6.49%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: —

QTR

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: -4.70%
• YTD: -6.22%
• 6M: -5.45%
• 1Y: 17.38%
• 3Y*: 17.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPAR vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

QTR

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF

RPAR

RPAR Risk Parity ETF

Return for Risk

RPAR vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR

RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 71
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 67

QTR

QTR Risk / Return Rank: 55
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPAR vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPAR	QTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.06	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.59	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.21	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	1.49	+0.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	5.22	+1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPAR vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPAR and QTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPAR	QTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.06	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.41	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and QTR is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RPAR vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than QTR's 20.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	2.13%	2.55%	2.51%	3.16%	4.01%	2.02%	0.76%	0.23%
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	20.02%	18.77%	0.50%	0.53%	0.36%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RPAR vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and QTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPAR	QTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.16%	-31.72%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.10%	-12.29%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.42%	-9.70%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-9.10%	-2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.50%	-1.20%

Volatility

RPAR vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 4.61%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPAR	QTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	5.04%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.76%	10.86%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.74%	16.47%	-4.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.35%	18.16%	-5.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.73%	18.16%	-5.43%