ROUS vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. ROUS is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, ROUS returned 28.51% vs 115.98% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

ROUS vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.

ROUS

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 28.51%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 12.70%
• 10Y*: 13.53%

WNTR

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 45.64%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 115.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	16.35%	14.35%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	17.65%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and WNTR is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.37

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 88
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROUS	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.20	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	2.46	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.33	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.80	2.73	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.27	6.99	+12.29

ROUS vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROUS	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.51%	-42.65%	+7.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-42.65%	+36.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-4.02%	+2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-20.87%	+16.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.48%	16.66%	-15.18%

Volatility

ROUS vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 3.86%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROUS	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	18.14%	-14.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	46.41%	-37.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.65%	53.16%	-41.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	53.31%	-38.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	53.31%	-36.33%

ROUS vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROUS vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.33%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	94.34%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROUS and WNTR in my portfolio?

ROUS and WNTR have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROUS or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to ROUS (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, ROUS or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 28.51% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROUS or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 28.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROUS or WNTR?

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROUS or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 1.33% for ROUS.

What is the main difference between ROUS and WNTR?

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.