ROUS vs. SGRT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT).

ROUS and SGRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROUS is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015.

Performance

ROUS vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROUS vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	3.48%	5.70%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	9.56%	25.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 9.56% return.

ROUS

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 4.19%
• 1Y: 19.00%
• 3Y*: 16.25%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: 11.74%

SGRT

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 15.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

SGRT

SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

ROUS

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 66
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROUS	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROUS	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	2.09	-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and SGRT is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ROUS vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than SGRT's 0.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.49%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROUS	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.51%	-17.87%	-17.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.36%	-7.09%	+3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-3.52%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROUS	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	32.60%	-16.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	32.60%	-18.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	32.60%	-15.66%