ROUS vs. RWL
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL).
ROUS and RWL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROUS is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. RWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 19, 2008. Both ROUS and RWL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ROUS vs. RWL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROUS vs. RWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 2.64% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 0.74% | 18.65% | 16.45% | 17.43% | -6.00% | 30.29% | 9.14% | 27.83% | -7.74% | 20.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly higher than RWL's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has underperformed RWL with an annualized return of 11.65%, while RWL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 18.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
RWL
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 4.59%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROUS vs. RWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RWL's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. RWL — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
RWL
ROUS vs. RWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROUS | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.68 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.64 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 7.90 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROUS | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.77 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.55 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and RWL is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ROUS vs. RWL - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than RWL's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.50% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 1.60% | 1.62% | 1.35% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. RWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum RWL drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and RWL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -54.83% | +19.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -11.26% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -17.49% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | -36.04% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -4.73% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -6.50% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.33% | -0.05% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. RWL - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) at 3.96%. This indicates that ROUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.96% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 7.71% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 15.13% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 14.55% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 16.89% | +0.05% |