PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RWL vs. VTV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RWLVTV
YTD Return21.13%21.21%
1Y Return29.47%30.33%
3Y Return (Ann)10.91%9.77%
5Y Return (Ann)14.24%11.68%
10Y Return (Ann)11.85%10.67%
Sharpe Ratio3.093.18
Sortino Ratio4.284.47
Omega Ratio1.581.59
Calmar Ratio5.226.42
Martin Ratio19.0820.69
Ulcer Index1.67%1.58%
Daily Std Dev10.30%10.27%
Max Drawdown-54.83%-59.27%
Current Drawdown-0.45%-0.65%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between RWL and VTV is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

RWL vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RWL having a 21.13% return and VTV slightly higher at 21.21%. Over the past 10 years, RWL has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 11.85%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.72%
10.33%
RWL
VTV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWL vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Expense ratio chart for RWL: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for VTV: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RWL vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RWL, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RWL, currently valued at 4.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RWL, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RWL, currently valued at 5.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RWL, currently valued at 19.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.08
VTV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VTV, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VTV, currently valued at 4.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VTV, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.59
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VTV, currently valued at 6.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VTV, currently valued at 20.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0020.69

RWL vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWL Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWL and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.09
3.18
RWL
VTV

Dividends

RWL vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

RWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than VTV's 2.23% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
1.39%1.60%1.62%1.35%1.75%1.87%1.99%1.61%1.71%1.97%1.43%1.61%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
2.23%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%2.22%2.21%

Drawdowns

RWL vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWL drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWL and VTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.45%
-0.65%
RWL
VTV

Volatility

RWL vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.65%. This indicates that RWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.90%
3.65%
RWL
VTV