ROUS vs. NITE
ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and NITE (The Nightview Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ROUS is passively managed, while NITE is actively managed. Over the past year, ROUS returned 25.72% vs 16.78% for NITE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for NITE.
Performance
ROUS vs. NITE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than NITE's 1.25% return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
NITE
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS vs. NITE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 15.51% | 15.21% | 6.43% |
NITE The Nightview Fund | 1.25% | 22.57% | 19.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and NITE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ROUS and NITE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROUS vs. NITE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROUS
NITE
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ROUS
NITE
Healthcare
ROUS
NITE
Financial Services
ROUS
NITE
Industrials
ROUS
NITE
Consumer Cyclical
ROUS
NITE
Communication Services
ROUS
NITE
Consumer Defensive
ROUS
NITE
-
Utilities
ROUS
NITE
Energy
ROUS
NITE
-
Basic Materials
ROUS
NITE
-
Real Estate
ROUS
NITE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. NITE — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
NITE
ROUS vs. NITE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and The Nightview Fund (NITE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROUS | NITE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 1.11 | +3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.39 | 3.11 | +14.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. NITE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than NITE's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and NITE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | NITE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -29.57% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -15.16% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -8.62% | +6.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -5.48% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 5.41% | -3.93% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. NITE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.89%, while The Nightview Fund (NITE) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NITE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | NITE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 5.67% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 16.23% | -7.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 20.79% | -9.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 26.50% | -12.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 26.50% | -9.58% |
ROUS vs. NITE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NITE's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROUS vs. NITE - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while NITE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NITE The Nightview Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.34% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROUS and NITE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NITE has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to ROUS (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs NITE's -29.57%.
On 1-year performance, ROUS leads with 25.72% vs 16.78% for NITE. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 16.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for NITE.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for NITE.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Nightview. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 1.25% for NITE.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROUS and NITE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer