NITE vs. CCOR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NITE (The Nightview Fund) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NITE returned 18.44% vs -2.08% for CCOR. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. NITE charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

NITE vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NITE achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's 0.07% return.

NITE

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: -1.76%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: 18.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: -1.41%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 1Y: -2.08%
• 3Y*: -0.68%
• 5Y*: -1.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NITE vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NITE The Nightview Fund	1.72%	22.57%	19.07%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.07%	3.52%	1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NITE and CCOR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	-0.05

NITE vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NITE	CCOR
Consumer Cyclical	34.9%	9.2%
Technology	30.6%	16.9%
Financial Services	17.4%	17.6%
Industrials	8.7%	9.3%
Utilities	4.0%	6.1%
Healthcare	3.8%	11.6%
Communication Services	3.7%	8.4%
Basic Materials	-	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Energy	-	6.6%
Real Estate	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

NITE vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NITE

NITE Risk / Return Rank: 30
NITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
NITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
NITE Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
NITE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 7
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NITE vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NITE	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	-0.26	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	-0.32	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.96	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	-0.24	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.47	-0.50	+3.97

NITE vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NITE Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NITE and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NITE vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NITE drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NITE and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NITE	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-22.99%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.16%	-8.79%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.19%	-16.89%	+8.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-7.41%	+1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.33%	4.14%	+1.19%

Volatility

NITE vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

The Nightview Fund (NITE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.98%. This indicates that NITE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NITE	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	3.98%	+2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.25%	6.16%	+10.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.79%	8.01%	+12.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.55%	11.19%	+15.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.55%	10.78%	+15.77%

NITE vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NITE has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

NITE vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

NITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.00%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
NITE The Nightview Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NITE and CCOR in my portfolio?

NITE and CCOR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NITE or CCOR?

NITE has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to CCOR (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NITE dropped -29.57% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, NITE or CCOR?

On 1-year performance, NITE leads with 18.44% vs -2.08% for CCOR. On fees, CCOR is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NITE or CCOR?

Over the 1-year period, NITE has performed better with a 18.44% return vs -2.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NITE or CCOR?

CCOR is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for NITE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NITE or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for NITE.

What is the main difference between NITE and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Nightview and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for NITE and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.