ROUS vs. IWP

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROUS returned 12.77%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for IWP. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWP.

Performance

ROUS vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 1.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROUS having a 12.77% annualized return and IWP not far behind at 12.22%.

ROUS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: 12.40%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

IWP

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 2.82%
• 3Y*: 15.01%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: 12.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	14.41%	15.21%	17.61%	15.05%	-9.65%	27.33%	6.61%	23.94%	-9.59%	22.88%
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	1.66%	8.45%	21.86%	25.70%	-26.90%	12.60%	35.25%	35.04%	-4.89%	24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and IWP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.76

The correlation between ROUS and IWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROUS vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROUS	IWP
Technology	33.2%	20.0%
Healthcare	10.7%	13.5%
Financial Services	10.6%	6.9%
Industrials	10.4%	24.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	21.1%
Communication Services	8.6%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	1.5%
Utilities	3.8%	2.9%
Energy	3.0%	3.8%
Basic Materials	2.2%	0.4%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.4%

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

IWP

IWP Risk / Return Rank: 12
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROUS	IWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	0.17	+2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	0.36	+2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.04	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	0.19	+4.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.21	0.56	+17.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROUS vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROUS	IWP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	0.17	+2.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.27	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.57	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.42	+0.24

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and IWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROUS	IWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.51%	-56.92%	+21.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-14.79%	+8.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-25.20%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	-38.62%	+19.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.51%	-38.62%	+3.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	-4.08%	+2.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-9.68%	+5.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	5.08%	-3.62%

Volatility

ROUS vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 3.19%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROUS	IWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	4.62%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	12.93%	-4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	16.71%	-5.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.40%	22.34%	-7.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	21.70%	-4.73%

ROUS vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ROUS vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than IWP's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.33%	0.37%	0.40%	0.54%	0.77%	0.30%	0.38%	0.59%	1.02%	0.78%	1.16%	0.98%
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.35%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROUS and IWP in my portfolio?

ROUS and IWP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROUS or IWP?

IWP has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to ROUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs IWP's -56.92%.

Which ETF is better, ROUS or IWP?

On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.77% vs 12.22% for IWP. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROUS or IWP?

Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROUS or IWP?

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROUS or IWP?

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.

What is the main difference between ROUS and IWP?

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.23% for IWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.