IWP vs. VO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO).
IWP and VO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. VO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both IWP and VO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWP or VO.
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and VO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWP vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWP:
1.49
VO:
1.34
IWP:
2.04
VO:
1.86
IWP:
1.26
VO:
1.24
IWP:
1.39
VO:
1.63
IWP:
7.93
VO:
7.86
IWP:
3.02%
VO:
2.15%
IWP:
16.09%
VO:
12.61%
IWP:
-56.92%
VO:
-58.89%
IWP:
-7.97%
VO:
-7.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 22.46% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, IWP has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 11.41%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
IWP
22.46%
-0.71%
15.48%
22.90%
11.37%
11.41%
VO
15.33%
-3.45%
9.49%
15.89%
9.97%
9.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWP vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWP has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWP vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWP vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VO's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.79% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.88% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% | 1.29% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
IWP vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and VO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWP vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.43%. This indicates that IWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.