ROUS vs. HMOP
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP).
ROUS and HMOP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROUS is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. HMOP is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Dec 13, 2017.
Performance
ROUS vs. HMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROUS vs. HMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 2.64% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 2.07% |
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | -0.10% | 4.70% | 2.52% | 6.83% | -8.37% | 1.80% | 5.52% | 7.77% | 1.59% | 0.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly higher than HMOP's -0.10% return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 18.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
HMOP
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.32%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROUS vs. HMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HMOP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. HMOP — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
HMOP
ROUS vs. HMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROUS | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.53 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.47 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 4.83 | +3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROUS | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.34 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and HMOP is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ROUS vs. HMOP - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than HMOP's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.50% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 3.51% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 2.92% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 5.26% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. HMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than HMOP's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and HMOP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -13.12% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -3.10% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -13.12% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -2.38% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -2.49% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 0.94% | +1.34% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. HMOP - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) at 1.08%. This indicates that ROUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 1.08% | +3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 1.78% | +7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 3.73% | +12.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 3.85% | +10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 4.29% | +12.65% |