PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMOP vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMOP vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMOP achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.22% return.


HMOP

1D
0.36%
1M
1.15%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*

VCIT

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMOP vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
1.68%4.70%2.52%6.83%-8.37%1.80%5.52%7.77%1.59%0.05%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.22%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HMOP and VCIT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017

0.51

The correlation between HMOP and VCIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMOP vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMOP
HMOP Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMOP vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HMOPVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.82

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

5.78

+1.49

HMOP vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMOP and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMOP vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMOP drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMOP and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMOPVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-20.56%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-2.96%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.81%

-6.11%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.12%

-20.56%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.32%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-3.15%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.93%

-0.08%

Volatility

HMOP vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) is 0.74%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that HMOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMOPVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

1.23%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

3.18%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

4.11%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.87%

6.62%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

6.29%

-2.04%

HMOP vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMOP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMOP vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

HMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than VCIT's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
3.45%3.40%3.22%2.92%2.12%1.67%5.26%2.87%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMOP and VCIT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCIT has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to HMOP (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMOP dropped -13.12% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 5-year performance, HMOP leads with 1.40% vs 1.14% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HMOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HMOP has performed better with a 1.40% return vs 1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for HMOP.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 3.45% for HMOP.

HMOP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HMOP and 0.03% for VCIT.

HMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMOP and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer