PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. FDEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than FDEGX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has outperformed FDEGX with an annualized return of 12.77%, while FDEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.


ROUS

1D
0.12%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.41%
6M
14.17%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
12.77%

FDEGX

1D
-3.58%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
8.51%
6M
-1.97%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
14.41%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
8.51%2.88%26.57%20.93%-26.50%21.30%29.34%36.59%-6.92%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and FDEGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015

0.76

The correlation between ROUS and FDEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEGX
FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROUSFDEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.04

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

0.15

+4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.21

0.37

+17.84

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the FDEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and FDEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROUSFDEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

0.13

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.34

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.54

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.40

+0.26

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and FDEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSFDEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-85.96%

+50.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-20.45%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-26.04%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-36.62%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-36.62%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-6.93%

+5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-36.82%

+32.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

8.01%

-6.55%

Volatility

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 3.19%, while Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSFDEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

6.56%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

19.21%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

22.26%

-10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

23.35%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

22.07%

-5.10%

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEGX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROUS vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%7.89%0.05%0.00%14.15%8.37%3.65%0.75%0.05%0.59%0.13%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.35%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROUS and FDEGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to ROUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs FDEGX's -85.96%.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and FDEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer