FDEGX vs. CANE
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE).
FDEGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1990. CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011.
Performance
FDEGX vs. CANE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDEGX vs. CANE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund | -7.25% | 2.88% | 26.57% | 20.93% | -26.50% | 21.30% | 29.34% | 36.59% | -6.92% | 21.03% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 7.02% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 3.59% | 36.30% | -3.85% | -0.97% | -27.52% | -24.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEGX achieves a -7.25% return, which is significantly lower than CANE's 7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FDEGX has outperformed CANE with an annualized return of 10.27%, while CANE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.05% annualized return.
FDEGX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -7.25%
- 6M
- -18.20%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
CANE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 12.38%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -14.50%
- 3Y*
- -2.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 0.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDEGX vs. CANE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CANE's 1.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDEGX vs. CANE — Risk / Return Rank
FDEGX
CANE
FDEGX vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEGX | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | -0.75 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | -1.01 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.89 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | -0.53 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | -0.79 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEGX | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | -0.75 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.00 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | -0.25 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEGX and CANE is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FDEGX vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FDEGX nor CANE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.89% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 14.15% | 8.37% | 3.65% | 0.75% | 0.05% | 0.59% | 0.13% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDEGX vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEGX drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than CANE's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEGX and CANE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEGX | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.96% | -81.30% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.45% | -28.86% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.62% | -41.73% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | -67.29% | +30.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.45% | -60.32% | +39.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.96% | -56.42% | +19.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.11% | 19.23% | -12.12% |
Volatility
FDEGX vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) have volatilities of 7.61% and 7.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDEGX | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 7.27% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.02% | 14.43% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.61% | 19.42% | +7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 20.96% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 21.79% | +0.06% |