FDEGX vs. CANE

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FDEGX (Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund) and CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) are both funds - FDEGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. FDEGX is actively managed, while CANE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDEGX returned 11.15%/yr vs -2.68%/yr for CANE. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FDEGX charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for CANE.

Performance

FDEGX vs. CANE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEGX achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly higher than CANE's -1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FDEGX has outperformed CANE with an annualized return of 11.15%, while CANE has yielded a comparatively lower -2.68% annualized return.

FDEGX

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: -6.65%
• 6M: 3.54%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 1Y: -5.46%
• 3Y*: 11.50%
• 5Y*: 4.68%
• 10Y*: 11.15%
• ALL TIME*: 9.42%

CANE

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 4.11%
• YTD: -1.38%
• 1Y: -11.17%
• 3Y*: -10.64%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: -2.68%
• ALL TIME*: -6.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	$1.32M	$1.65M	$3.43M
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FDEGX vs. CANE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	3.63%	2.88%	26.57%	20.93%	-26.50%	21.30%	29.34%	36.59%	-6.92%	21.03%
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	-1.38%	-14.65%	-7.79%	30.06%	3.59%	36.30%	-3.85%	-0.97%	-27.52%	-24.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEGX and CANE is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011	0.07

Return for Risk

FDEGX vs. CANE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDEGX

FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CANE

CANE Risk / Return Rank: 5
CANE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDEGX vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDEGX	CANE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.31	-0.59	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	-0.73	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.92	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	-0.60	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	-0.89	-0.01

FDEGX vs. CANE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is higher than the CANE Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEGX and CANE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDEGX vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEGX drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than CANE's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEGX and CANE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEGX	CANE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.96%	-81.30%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.45%	-19.82%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.04%	-41.73%	+15.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.62%	-41.73%	+5.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.62%	-67.29%	+30.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.12%	-63.44%	+52.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.68%	-56.56%	+19.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.42%	13.33%	-4.91%

Volatility

FDEGX vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) at 5.03%. This indicates that FDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEGX	CANE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	5.03%	+2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.45%	16.18%	+2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.05%	20.20%	+3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.74%	20.92%	+2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.23%	21.58%	+0.65%

FDEGX vs. CANE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEGX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CANE's 1.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEGX vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDEGX nor CANE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.89%	0.05%	0.00%	14.15%	8.37%	3.65%	0.75%	0.05%	0.59%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEGX and CANE in my portfolio?

FDEGX and CANE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDEGX or CANE?

FDEGX has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to CANE (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEGX dropped -85.96% vs CANE's -81.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.