ROUS vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. ROUS is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROUS returned 13.01%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for COMT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

ROUS vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has outperformed COMT with an annualized return of 13.01%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.

ROUS

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.18%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 16.75%
• 1Y: 29.42%
• 3Y*: 20.87%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	16.55%	15.21%	17.61%	15.05%	-9.65%	27.33%	6.61%	23.94%	-9.59%	22.88%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	5.96%	-6.56%	19.45%	36.88%	-18.66%	10.81%	-6.67%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and COMT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.25

The correlation between ROUS and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROUS vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROUS	COMT
Technology	33.2%	-
Healthcare	10.7%	-
Financial Services	10.6%	100.0%
Industrials	10.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Communication Services	8.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	-
Utilities	3.8%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	-
Real Estate	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROUS	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	2.24	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	2.88	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.40	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	5.95	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.38	14.11	+6.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROUS vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROUS	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	2.24	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.64	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.48	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.20	+0.47

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROUS	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.51%	-51.89%	+16.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-8.02%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-13.31%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	-29.00%	+10.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.51%	-39.22%	+3.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.82%	+4.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-24.07%	+19.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	3.38%	-1.93%

Volatility

ROUS vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.54%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROUS	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	7.37%	-4.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	18.80%	-10.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	21.29%	-9.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	21.06%	-6.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	18.89%	-1.93%

ROUS vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROUS vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.32%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROUS and COMT in my portfolio?

ROUS and COMT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROUS or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, ROUS or COMT?

On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 13.01% vs 9.09% for COMT. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROUS or COMT?

Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROUS or COMT?

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROUS or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

What is the main difference between ROUS and COMT?

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.