ROUS vs. ACGR
ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index while ACGR tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROUS returned 12.84%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for ACGR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ACGR.
Performance
ROUS vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly higher than ACGR's 7.39% return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
ACGR
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.55% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 4.34% |
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 7.39% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and ACGR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between ROUS and ACGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
ACGR
ROUS vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROUS | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.27 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 1.53 | +3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.38 | 5.20 | +15.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROUS | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 1.57 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.70 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.70 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, roughly equal to the maximum ACGR drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and ACGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -34.54% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -15.84% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -24.58% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -34.54% | +15.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.68% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -8.50% | +4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 4.66% | -3.21% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.54%, while American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 3.65% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 11.95% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 15.49% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 21.51% | -7.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 21.42% | -4.46% |
ROUS vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ACGR's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROUS vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than ACGR's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROUS and ACGR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACGR has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs ACGR's -34.54%.
On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 15.06% vs 12.84% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACGR.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.09% for ACGR.
ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while ACGR tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.39% for ACGR.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROUS and ACGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer