PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROSC vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROSC vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly higher than ROUS's 16.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ROSC has underperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 10.89%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


ROSC

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.15%
6M
14.78%
YTD
19.82%
1Y
38.72%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
10.89%
ALL TIME*
9.73%

ROUS

1D
0.35%
1M
0.39%
6M
12.32%
YTD
16.47%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
12.74%
ALL TIME*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$129.89K$138.46K$121.53K
$3.37M$3.67M$3.26M

ROSC vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
19.82%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%24.49%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.47%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and ROUS is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.74

The correlation between ROSC and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROSC vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROSC
ROUS

Financial Services

19.3%
11.1%

Healthcare

19.0%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
9.1%

Technology

12.3%
35.2%

Industrials

11.5%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.4%

Real Estate

5.7%
2.2%

Communication Services

3.6%
6.3%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.1%

Energy

2.3%
2.7%

Utilities

1.8%
3.7%

Financial Services

ROSC
19.3%
ROUS
11.1%

Healthcare

ROSC
19.0%
ROUS
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ROSC
14.8%
ROUS
9.1%

Technology

ROSC
12.3%
ROUS
35.2%

Industrials

ROSC
11.5%
ROUS
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

ROSC
6.3%
ROUS
5.4%

Real Estate

ROSC
5.7%
ROUS
2.2%

Communication Services

ROSC
3.6%
ROUS
6.3%

Basic Materials

ROSC
2.7%
ROUS
2.1%

Energy

ROSC
2.3%
ROUS
2.7%

Utilities

ROSC
1.8%
ROUS
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROSC vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROSC vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROSCROUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

4.31

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.90

17.07

-1.17

ROSC vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROSCROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

-35.51%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-5.97%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-15.81%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-18.91%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-35.51%

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-0.94%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-4.20%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

1.51%

+0.79%

Volatility

ROSC vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.46%. This indicates that ROSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROSCROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

2.46%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

8.78%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

11.64%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

14.42%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

16.91%

+3.33%

ROSC vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROSC vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.80%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROSC and ROUS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROSC has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to ROUS (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.74% vs 10.89% for ROSC. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ROUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.19% for ROUS.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROSC and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer