PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROSC vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROSC vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ROSC has underperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 10.48%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.


ROSC

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.50%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.39%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.48%

ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROSC vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.71%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%24.49%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.55%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and ROUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.74

The correlation between ROSC and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROSC vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROSC
ROUS

Healthcare

20.1%
10.7%

Financial Services

18.7%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
9.6%

Technology

12.1%
33.2%

Industrials

11.2%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
5.8%

Real Estate

5.5%
2.1%

Energy

3.8%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.6%
8.6%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.2%

Utilities

1.9%
3.8%

Healthcare

ROSC
20.1%
ROUS
10.7%

Financial Services

ROSC
18.7%
ROUS
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ROSC
14.1%
ROUS
9.6%

Technology

ROSC
12.1%
ROUS
33.2%

Industrials

ROSC
11.2%
ROUS
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

ROSC
6.6%
ROUS
5.8%

Real Estate

ROSC
5.5%
ROUS
2.1%

Energy

ROSC
3.8%
ROUS
3.0%

Communication Services

ROSC
3.6%
ROUS
8.6%

Basic Materials

ROSC
2.5%
ROUS
2.2%

Utilities

ROSC
1.9%
ROUS
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROSC vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROSC vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROSCROUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

2.60

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

3.67

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.95

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.81

20.38

-7.57

ROSC vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROSCROUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.60

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.90

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.77

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.67

-0.21

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROSCROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

-35.51%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-5.97%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-15.81%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-18.91%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-35.51%

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

0.00%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-4.24%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

1.45%

+0.94%

Volatility

ROSC vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that ROSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROSCROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.54%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

8.50%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

11.37%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

14.38%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

16.96%

+3.32%

ROSC vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROSC vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.87%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROSC and ROUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROSC has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 13.01% vs 10.48% for ROSC. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ROUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.19% for ROUS.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROSC and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer