RONB vs. SPYG
RONB (Baron First Principles ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RONB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. RONB is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RONB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
RONB vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RONB achieves a -6.63% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.70% return.
RONB
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- -6.63%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
RONB vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | -6.63% | -0.76% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RONB and SPYG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RONB vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
RONB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYG
RONB vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RONB | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RONB vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RONB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RONB and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RONB | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -67.63% | +54.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.26% | -5.52% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -24.28% | +18.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.46% | — |
Volatility
RONB vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RONB | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 17.26% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 21.36% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 20.73% | -0.30% |
RONB vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RONB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RONB vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
RONB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RONB and SPYG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for RONB.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for RONB.
RONB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for RONB and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for RONB and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer