ROMO vs. RPAR
ROMO (Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF) and RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index, while RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments. ROMO is passively managed, while RPAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROMO returned 6.78%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for RPAR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROMO charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for RPAR.
Performance
ROMO vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROMO achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than RPAR's 7.53% return.
ROMO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
RPAR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ROMO vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF | 6.33% | 9.29% | 20.68% | 11.05% | -18.88% | 21.41% | -3.48% | 1.79% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 7.53% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -22.82% | 7.56% | 19.40% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROMO and RPAR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ROMO and RPAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ROMO vs. RPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROMO
RPAR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ROMO
RPAR
Industrials
ROMO
RPAR
Technology
ROMO
RPAR
Healthcare
ROMO
RPAR
Consumer Cyclical
ROMO
RPAR
Consumer Defensive
ROMO
RPAR
Basic Materials
ROMO
RPAR
Communication Services
ROMO
RPAR
Energy
ROMO
RPAR
Utilities
ROMO
RPAR
Real Estate
ROMO
RPAR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROMO vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank
ROMO
RPAR
ROMO vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROMO | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.63 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 8.71 | -3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROMO | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.09 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.14 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.36 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
ROMO vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROMO drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, roughly equal to the maximum RPAR drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMO and RPAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROMO | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.66% | -30.16% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -8.10% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | -13.20% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | -30.16% | +9.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -2.64% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -11.61% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.44% | +0.64% |
Volatility
ROMO vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison
Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 3.56%. This indicates that ROMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROMO | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 3.56% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 8.37% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 10.20% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 12.40% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 12.69% | +1.76% |
ROMO vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROMO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROMO vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison
ROMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than RPAR's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF | 8.34% | 8.87% | 0.76% | 2.42% | 0.77% | 0.56% | 0.97% | 0.58% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.07% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROMO and RPAR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROMO has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROMO dropped -28.66% vs RPAR's -30.16%.
On 5-year performance, ROMO leads with 6.78% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, RPAR is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROMO has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPAR is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for ROMO.
ROMO has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.
ROMO is categorized as Momentum, while RPAR is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Rational Capital LLC and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for ROMO and 0.51% for RPAR.
RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROMO and RPAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer