PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROMO vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROMO vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROMO achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


ROMO

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.99%
YTD
6.33%
6M
7.08%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROMO vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ROMO
Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF
6.33%9.29%20.68%11.05%-18.88%21.41%-3.48%4.41%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ROMO and MTUM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019

0.74

The correlation between ROMO and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROMO vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROMO
MTUM

Financial Services

22.0%
10.4%

Industrials

19.4%
15.6%

Technology

12.5%
44.4%

Healthcare

9.6%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

6.2%
1.7%

Communication Services

5.0%
7.4%

Energy

3.9%
3.5%

Utilities

3.6%
1.6%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

ROMO
22.0%
MTUM
10.4%

Industrials

ROMO
19.4%
MTUM
15.6%

Technology

ROMO
12.5%
MTUM
44.4%

Healthcare

ROMO
9.6%
MTUM
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ROMO
8.4%
MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

ROMO
6.3%
MTUM
3.3%

Basic Materials

ROMO
6.2%
MTUM
1.7%

Communication Services

ROMO
5.0%
MTUM
7.4%

Energy

ROMO
3.9%
MTUM
3.5%

Utilities

ROMO
3.6%
MTUM
1.6%

Real Estate

ROMO
3.0%
MTUM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROMO vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROMO
ROMO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ROMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ROMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROMO vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROMOMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.64

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.70

14.50

-8.80

ROMO vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROMO and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROMOMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.20

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.74

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Drawdowns

ROMO vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROMO drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMO and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMOMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.66%

-34.08%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.16%

-11.54%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.09%

-20.99%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.26%

-32.28%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

0.00%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-6.21%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.89%

+0.19%

Volatility

ROMO vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) is 4.12%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that ROMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROMOMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

7.68%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

16.46%

-5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

19.04%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

20.60%

-8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

21.03%

-6.58%

ROMO vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROMO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROMO vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

ROMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
ROMO
Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF
8.34%8.87%0.76%2.42%0.77%0.56%0.97%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROMO and MTUM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to ROMO (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROMO dropped -28.66% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.21% vs 6.78% for ROMO. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ROMO has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for ROMO.

ROMO has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

ROMO tracks Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Rational Capital LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for ROMO and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROMO and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer