ROM vs. QTAP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).
ROM and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
ROM vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROM vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | -16.84% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 62.24% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 1.26% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 1.26% return.
ROM
- 1D
- 8.36%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -16.84%
- 6M
- -15.35%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 31.73%
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROM vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
QTAP
ROM vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.22 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.94 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.48 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.73 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 12.34 | -7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.22 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and QTAP is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ROM vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.29% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROM vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and QTAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -29.44% | -53.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -12.04% | -20.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.67% | -0.51% | -26.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -5.21% | -15.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 1.68% | +9.13% |
Volatility
ROM vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 0.76%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | 0.76% | +15.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.95% | 2.75% | +30.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.78% | 16.31% | +37.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.32% | 19.02% | +32.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.50% | 19.02% | +30.48% |