ROM vs. BITO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO).
ROM and BITO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. BITO is an actively managed fund by ProShares. It was launched on Oct 19, 2021.
Performance
ROM vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROM vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | -16.84% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 13.17% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -23.25% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -31.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -23.25% return.
ROM
- 1D
- 8.36%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -16.84%
- 6M
- -15.35%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 31.73%
BITO
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- -23.25%
- 6M
- -41.96%
- 1Y
- -21.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROM vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ROM and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
BITO
ROM vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | -0.48 | +1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | -0.43 | +1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.95 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | -0.46 | +1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | -0.97 | +5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | -0.48 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.08 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and BITO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ROM vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than BITO's 84.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.29% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 84.71% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROM vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and BITO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -77.86% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -50.05% | +17.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.67% | -47.07% | +20.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -36.56% | +15.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 23.55% | -12.74% |
Volatility
ROM vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 12.89%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | 12.89% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.95% | 36.69% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.78% | 45.35% | +8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.32% | 55.79% | -4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.50% | 55.79% | -6.29% |