ROL vs. QQQI
ROL (Rollins, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, ROL returned -17.70% vs 22.03% for QQQI. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROL vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -24.68% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.40% return.
ROL
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -25.90%
- YTD
- -24.68%
- 1Y
- -17.70%
- 3Y*
- 1.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
QQQI
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROL vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ROL Rollins, Inc. | -24.68% | 31.06% | 8.60% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.40% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROL and QQQI is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between ROL and QQQI shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROL vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
ROL
QQQI
ROL vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.27 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.30 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 9.51 | -10.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROL vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -20.00% | -37.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.96% | -9.61% | -26.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.08% | -2.84% | -28.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.18% | -2.21% | -9.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.75% | 2.32% | +11.43% |
Volatility
ROL vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Rollins, Inc. (ROL) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.43%. This indicates that ROL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 7.43% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.92% | 12.76% | +7.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.14% | 15.44% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 17.60% | +7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 17.60% | +7.52% |
Dividends
ROL vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than QQQI's 13.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.76% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | 1.59% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.84% | 1.42% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROL and QQQI have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROL has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to QQQI (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROL and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer