PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROL vs. POOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROL vs. POOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Pool Corporation (POOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -24.48% return, which is significantly lower than POOL's -20.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has outperformed POOL with an annualized return of 14.86%, while POOL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.


ROL

1D
-2.76%
1M
-17.50%
YTD
-24.48%
6M
-25.57%
1Y
-22.16%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
14.86%

POOL

1D
-1.36%
1M
-13.05%
YTD
-20.43%
6M
-25.62%
1Y
-38.80%
3Y*
-16.71%
5Y*
-15.20%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROL vs. POOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
-24.48%31.06%7.56%21.19%8.10%-11.43%78.47%-6.95%17.61%39.61%
POOL
Pool Corporation
-20.43%-31.81%-13.39%33.51%-46.03%52.98%76.95%44.50%15.97%25.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ROL and POOL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 1995

0.35

The correlation between ROL and POOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROL:

$21.68B

POOL:

$6.54B

EPS

ROL:

$1.10

POOL:

$10.96

PE Ratio

ROL:

41.13

POOL:

16.38

PS Ratio

ROL:

5.66

POOL:

1.24

PB Ratio

ROL:

15.69

POOL:

5.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROL:

$3.84B

POOL:

$5.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROL:

$1.53B

POOL:

$1.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

ROL:

$859.94M

POOL:

$636.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROL vs. POOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROL
ROL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ROL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ROL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

POOL
POOL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
POOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
POOL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
POOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
POOL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROL vs. POOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Pool Corporation (POOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROLPOOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.93

-1.17

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.19

-1.70

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.80

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

-0.83

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.18

-1.56

-0.62

ROL vs. POOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROL Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is comparable to the POOL Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROL and POOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROLPOOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

-1.17

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

-0.45

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.26

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Drawdowns

ROL vs. POOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum POOL drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and POOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROLPOOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.27%

-75.71%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.90%

-46.86%

+15.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

-56.77%

+25.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.90%

-67.85%

+36.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.90%

-67.85%

+36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.90%

-66.83%

+35.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-18.32%

+6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.35%

24.99%

-15.64%

Volatility

ROL vs. POOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) is 7.92%, while Pool Corporation (POOL) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that ROL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROLPOOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

11.08%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.86%

26.08%

-7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.99%

33.29%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

33.87%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.03%

31.53%

-6.50%

Dividends

ROL vs. POOL - Dividend Comparison

ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than POOL's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POOL
Pool Corporation
2.81%2.16%1.38%1.08%1.26%0.53%0.61%0.99%1.16%1.10%1.14%1.24%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
1.58%1.13%1.33%1.24%1.18%1.23%0.84%1.42%1.03%1.20%1.18%1.62%

Financials

ROL vs. POOL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rollins, Inc. and Pool Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
906.42M
1.14B
(ROL) Total Revenue
(POOL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROL vs. POOL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rollins, Inc. and Pool Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
29.0%
Portfolio components
ROL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

POOL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pool Corporation reported a gross profit of 329.87M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.

ROL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

POOL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pool Corporation reported an operating income of 82.61M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

ROL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.

POOL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pool Corporation reported a net income of 53.23M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROL and POOL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POOL has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to ROL (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs POOL's -75.71%.

ROL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.93 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROL and POOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer