ROL vs. RTO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO).

Performance

ROL vs. RTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROL vs. RTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROL Rollins, Inc.	-10.74%	31.06%	7.56%	21.19%	8.10%	-11.43%	78.47%	-6.95%	17.61%	39.61%
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC	6.86%	19.64%	-9.78%	-5.92%	-22.27%	14.36%	16.84%	42.28%	-0.22%	64.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ROL : $25.79B RTO : $15.98B
EPS ROL : $1.09 RTO : $1.39
PE Ratio ROL : 49.08 RTO : 22.68
PEG Ratio ROL : 4.44 RTO : 12.29
PS Ratio ROL : 6.87 RTO : 1.40
PB Ratio ROL : 18.76 RTO : 3.92
Total Revenue (TTM) ROL : $3.76B RTO : $11.42B
Gross Profit (TTM) ROL : $1.86B RTO : $1.54B
EBITDA (TTM) ROL : $854.34M RTO : $2.16B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly lower than RTO's 6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has outperformed RTO with an annualized return of 17.38%, while RTO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.57% annualized return.

ROL

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -12.28%
• YTD: -10.74%
• 6M: -8.51%
• 1Y: 0.03%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: 17.38%

RTO

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 6.86%
• 6M: 24.67%
• 1Y: 41.35%
• 3Y*: -2.89%
• 5Y*: -0.48%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ROL vs. RTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROL

ROL Risk / Return Rank: 40
ROL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ROL Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ROL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ROL Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ROL Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RTO

RTO Risk / Return Rank: 81
RTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
RTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RTO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RTO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROL vs. RTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROL	RTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	1.25	-1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	2.02	-1.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.25	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	2.95	-2.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	8.49	-8.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROL vs. RTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROL Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the RTO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROL and RTO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROL	RTO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	1.25	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	-0.01	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.35	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.13	+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between ROL and RTO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ROL vs. RTO - Dividend Comparison

ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than RTO's 2.08% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROL Rollins, Inc.	1.30%	1.13%	1.33%	1.24%	1.18%	1.23%	0.84%	1.42%	1.03%	1.20%	1.18%	1.62%
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC	2.08%	2.23%	2.28%	1.73%	1.38%	1.30%	0.00%	0.87%	1.14%	1.69%	2.99%	1.54%

Drawdowns

ROL vs. RTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum RTO drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and RTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROL	RTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.27%	-86.53%	+29.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.79%	-14.05%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.68%	-50.94%	+24.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.32%	-50.94%	+20.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.34%	-21.50%	+3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.10%	-30.65%	+18.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	4.88%	+0.75%

Volatility

ROL vs. RTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) is 6.16%, while Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that ROL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROL	RTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	14.23%	-8.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.91%	23.52%	-4.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.38%	33.20%	-8.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.41%	34.48%	-10.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.86%	33.00%	-8.14%

Financials

ROL vs. RTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rollins, Inc. and Rentokil Initial PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ROL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.61M and revenue of 912.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.

RTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.

ROL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 160.07M and revenue of 912.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

RTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

ROL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 116.44M and revenue of 912.91M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

RTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 208.50M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.