PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROL vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROL vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -20.87% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has outperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 15.58%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.


ROL

1D
0.30%
1M
-11.66%
YTD
-20.87%
6M
-20.91%
1Y
-16.00%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
15.58%

HSCZ

1D
0.71%
1M
0.48%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.18%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROL vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
-20.87%31.06%7.56%21.19%8.10%-11.43%78.47%-6.95%17.61%39.61%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.99%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ROL and HSCZ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.32

The correlation between ROL and HSCZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROL vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROL
ROL Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ROL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ROL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROL vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROLHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.45

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

2.95

-3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.58

12.57

-14.15

ROL vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROL and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROL vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROLHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.27%

-34.89%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.90%

-9.61%

-21.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

-12.81%

-18.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.90%

-20.11%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.90%

-34.89%

+3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.60%

-0.60%

-27.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-4.64%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.53%

2.25%

+8.28%

Volatility

ROL vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

Rollins, Inc. (ROL) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 4.08%. This indicates that ROL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROLHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

4.08%

+5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.67%

9.68%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.16%

11.60%

+12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.59%

13.52%

+11.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

15.68%

+9.36%

Dividends

ROL vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than HSCZ's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.93%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
1.51%1.13%1.33%1.24%1.18%1.23%0.84%1.42%1.03%1.20%1.18%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROL and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROL has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to HSCZ (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROL and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer